The former is the second U.S. intelligence officerConcerned over political divisions, he decided to step away from the opportunity to take the top role, and that could have led to greater rift between President Trump and the US intelligence community.
Career Detective Officer Sue Gordon, who served as Assistant to the National Intelligence Director (DNI) Dan Coats – and will be resigned from the post of DNI to the post of Quote on August 27 – will be clear if the president resigns. Oppose his prayer.
“I did not want to be another source of deficit between the president and the intelligence community,” Gordon said, “and the most important thing was that the president gained intelligence.”
He says he was also concerned with the increasingly divisive public narratives about his role – as he wrote, about working as a “nail in other people’s hammers.”
“Depending on the political spectrum you came across,” Gordon said, “I was either a profound state of a naughty avatar – which was obviously freed – or a brilliant intellectual professional who stood up and made the truth a reality.”
“And the problem was, I didn’t want to be on anyone’s agenda,” he said.
Spoke to Gordon Detectives Host and CBS senior national security contributor Michael Morrell, who teaches at the Scar School of Policy and Government at Jordan Mason University. Gordon was interviewed on Monday at an event hosted by the Hayden Center.
Last summer, the president announced on Twitter that he would not accept the role of actor DNI, now head coach Joseph Maguire’s resignation of the head of the National Antitrust Center. His handwritten notes, along with his resignation letter, were submitted to President Trump and later released to the White House, saying he was not “liking” to leave. It was seen by some as a small but symbolic act of rebellion.
On August 8, he wrote to the president, “I propose this letter as an act of respect and patriotism, not a priority”. He wrote, “You should have a party,” he wrote, “Godspeed, litigation.”
In Monday’s interview, Gordon said he made the note in his car outside the White House, warning that he would not be able to speak to Mr. Trump personally and that simply submitting the typed resignation would be viewed as “rude.”
“‘I should throw the note in my hand in order not to be rude,'” Gordon said as he made the decision. “And so the note to the President really meant, ‘You don’t have to do this … I’m not resigning because I run away.’ Trying to go I’m giving you room and I respect you. If “it’s not what you want, don’t do it,” he said.
Gordon, who spent more than three decades in the CIA and other intelligence positions before being appointed deputy to Mr. Trump’s quotes in 20, is reported to have had bipartisan support in Congress and praised his leadership in the intelligence community. Since his resignation, he has started working as a consultant to Microsoft and a senior intelligence consultant for the Intelligence and National Security Alliance.
The current acting DNI Maguire must, by law, be formally nominated for the role or be replaced in early March. His position with the White House is unclear; He publicly protested his decision to withhold a whistleblower complaint that prompted a public inquiry, but added that the complainant, a CIA employee, had acted appropriately. The New York Times Report A “fluid” conversation about a possible replacement for Maguire is in the White House earlier this week.
In Monday’s interview, Gordon said it was important for intelligence community leaders to speak publicly about when and if the intelligence agency or the intelligence community needed to clarify what they had said about a given issue. He repeatedly cited the public and private defense of intelligence intelligence quotes, notably 2018 statement Issued after President Trump’s controversial 2018 press conference with Vladimir Putin.
“[Director Coats] Just came out and fixed the record. And I think what I did was two things, “Gordon said.” I think we have the intelligence system, and I think the current leaders have made the intelligence community even bigger. And second, it’s just established that there are some conversations that we’re not going to – you won’t be able to tell about the intelligence community. “
He also responded to the ongoing stagnation between the Congressional Intelligence Committee and the intelligence community about receiving annual public testimony about the global threat. “It’s a difficult situation, because you can say things publicly but when you’ve been challenged, it’s hard to defend publicly,” he said.
Yet, he said, the American people are necessarily involved in national security and open dialogue with intelligence leadership has become increasingly important.
“I think that what we’ve learned over time is that national security issues are spreading to the public. They affect the public,” Gordon said. “I can’t think of a time when there was no leadership statement, but I think they have to be ready to talk, because every once in a while you have to revise the record. You always have and I doubt you will always.”